Keto-Enol Tautomerism: Key Points
The reason for the equilibrium lying to the left is due to bond energies. The keto form has a C–H, C–C, and C=O bond whereas the enol has a C=C, C–O an O–H bond. The sum of the first three is about 359 kcal/mol (1500 kJ/mol) and the second three is 347 kcal/mol (1452 kJ/mol). The keto form is therefore more thermodynamically stable by 12 kcal/mol (48 kJ/mol).
Although the keto form is most stable for aldehydes and ketones in most situations, there are several factors that will shift the equilibrium toward the enol form. The same factors that stabilize alkenes or alcohols will also stabilize the enol form. There are two strong factors and three subtle factors.
1. Aromaticity. Phenols can theoretically exist in their keto forms, but the enol form is greatly favored due to aromatic stabilization.
2. Hydrogen Bonding. Nearby hydrogen bond acceptors stabilize the enol form. When a Lewis basic group is nearby, the enol form is stabilized by internal hydrogen bonding.
Here are three more subtle effects in keto-enol tautomerism:
3. Solvent. Solvent can also play an important role in the relative stability of the enol form. For example, in benzene, the enol form of 2,4-pentanedione predominates in a 94:6 ratio over the keto form, whereas the numbers almost reverse completely in water. What’s going on? In a polar protic solvent like water, the lone pairs will be involved in hydrogen bonding with the solvent, making them less available to hydrogen bond with the enol form.
4. Conjugation . π systems are a little like Cheerios in milk: given the choice, they want to connect together than hang out in isolation. So in the molecule depicted, the more favorable tautomer will be the one on the left, where the double bond is a connected by conjugation to the phenyl.
5. Substitution. In the absence of steric factors, increasing substitution at carbon will stabilize the enol form. Enols are alkenes too – so any factors that stabilize alkenes, will stabilize enols as well. All else being equal, double bonds increase in thermodynamic stability as substitution is increased. So in the above example, the enol on the left should be the more stable one. As you might suspect, “all things being equal” sounds like a big caveat. It is – all else is rarely equal. But that’s a topic for another day – or, more likely, another course.
Sources: “March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry”, “Solvents and solvent effects in Organic Chemistry”, by Christian Riechart. EDIT: Commenter Natalia helpfully points out that Carey & Sundberg A is a great resource for this topic (section 7.3 in my 4th edition) and she is right.
One really interesting observation is that when you dissolve acetone in D2O, you slowly get incorporation of deuterium at the alpha carbon. This is the enol tautomer at work – it reacts with a proton/deuteron source at the alpha carbon and regenerates the ketone.
Under normal conditions, this is a pretty slow reaction. But when you add a bit of acid, suddenly the rate of deuterium incorporation drastically increases. What’s going on here?
Let’s call the rate for conversion of ketone into enol K1 and the rate for conversion of enol into ketone K2. The cool thing is, acid speeds up BOTH reactions for keto-enol tautomerism – both the forward and the reverse reaction. Here’s how it works.
1) For K1 (keto to enol), acid protonates the carbonyl, making the carbonyl carbon more electrophilic. The more electrophilic the carbonyl the stronger an acid it becomes at the alpha carbon (remember, trifluoroacetone is more acidic than acetone). So deprotonation at the alpha carbon becomes much easier in the presence of acid, which results in the enol form.
2) For K2, acid also speeds up the conversion of the enol to the keto form. The enol form is nucleophilic at the alpha carbon, and reacts with the strongest electrophile around. An acid – say, D2SO4 – is a much, much stronger electrophile than D2O, so this is going to increase the rate of the enol to ketone conversion.
ring chain tautomerism
